<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Using Java 1.4 or 1.5?</title>
    <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Are you using Java 1.4 or Java 1.5?</description>
    <item>
      <title>java 1.5 is winning with 118 out of 190 votes</title>
      <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
      <description>Are you using Java 1.4 or Java 1.5?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</guid>
      <author>info@quimble.com (ob1)</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMMENT: I get an error "Application error (Rails)</title>
      <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
      <description>I get an error "Application error (Rails)" when I try to vote. Move onto Java 1.5!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</guid>
      <author>info@quimble.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMMENT: I don't know if I have voted 3 times or 1</title>
      <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
      <description>I don't know if I have voted 3 times or 1 time, it looks like the UI didn't update, or at least not instantly.  Anyways, 1.5 is significantly more - so, it didn't matter</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</guid>
      <author>info@quimble.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMMENT: Even if just 32% of the users use Java 1.</title>
      <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
      <description>Even if just 32% of the users use Java 1.4 and don't plan to upgrade (that is the result of the current poll), and this is not a majority, it's still a significant percentage, which relying on Java 1.5 will harm.
The question is, what *good* will relying on Java 1.5 do? The benefits raised by some people on the list are mostly about syntactic sugar, which I may dare call insignificant. I don't think it's a wise move to prevent 32% of the people from using Lucene, just to win an insignificant benefit.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</guid>
      <author>info@quimble.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMMENT: My concern is with gcj.  I'd like to make</title>
      <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
      <description>My concern is with gcj.  I'd like to make sure that the main branch of Lucene stays consistent with the version of gcj in Debian stable.

The "modernity" of Java Lucene, by the way, has to do with the algorithms in it, not the syntax of the language in which it is written.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</guid>
      <author>info@quimble.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMMENT: Lucene needs to move forward and stay mod</title>
      <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
      <description>Lucene needs to move forward and stay modern. The 2.0.x branch should be maintained for JDK 1.4 users.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</guid>
      <author>info@quimble.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMMENT: The concern here is integrations with App</title>
      <link>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</link>
      <description>The concern here is integrations with Application Servers (JBoss, Oracle, WebLogic, WebSphere, etc.)  Current Production instances tend to use 1.4.xx.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.quimble.com/poll/view_poll/2156</guid>
      <author>info@quimble.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
